Family,
Does anyone know when we will be receiving the case studies from Dr. Damon??
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Monday, November 22, 2010
Friday, November 19, 2010
GENOGRAM!
HEY GUYS!
Does anyone have a genogram sample from the buddy files? I would love to get an idea on organization! thanks
mpreston87@gmail.com
Does anyone have a genogram sample from the buddy files? I would love to get an idea on organization! thanks
mpreston87@gmail.com
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Fishbowl help!
I know I have sent an email already, but I was afraid I missed someone...and I am a bit OCD....
Is there any kind soul that would be willing to take my fishbowl hour for me this coming Monday (11/22/10) @ 12p.m.? I am begging.......I will bake for you upon my return :)
Love--stephanie hathorn
Is there any kind soul that would be willing to take my fishbowl hour for me this coming Monday (11/22/10) @ 12p.m.? I am begging.......I will bake for you upon my return :)
Love--stephanie hathorn
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
FINAL EXAM HELP PART 2
FAMILY SYSTEMS EXAM HELP
| * Bolded terms need clarification from Dr. Hurley | |
| accommodation | Elements of a system automatically adjust to coordinate their functioning: people may have to work at it. |
| alliance | cooperative arrangements between two parties, not formed at the expense of a third. (positive, different than coalition) |
| black box metaphor | The idea that because the mind is so complex, it’s better to study people’s input & output (behavior, communication) than to speculate about what goes on in their minds. |
| blended families | Separate families united by marriage; stepfamilies |
| boundaries | Emotional & physical barriers that protect & enhance the integrity of individuals, subsystems, & families |
| circular causality | The idea that actions are related through a series of recursive loops or repeating cycles |
| circular questioning | A method of interviewing that asks questions that highlight differences among family members. |
| coalition | An alliance between two persons or social units against a third |
| communications theory | The study of relationships in terms of the exchange of messages (verbal and nonverbal). |
| complementarily | the reciprocity that is the defining feature of any relationship |
| complementary relationships | Relationship based on differences that fit together, where qualities of one make up for lacks in the other; one is a one-up while the other is one-down |
| concurrent therapy | treatment of two or more person seen separately by different therapists |
| conjoint therapy | two or more people are seen together by the same therapist. |
| constructivism | Reality is subjectively constructed by people. Knowledge is a product of the way our imaginations are organized - Kant. Therapists can be guilty of this, defining their own reality of the clients situation. |
| cross-generational coalition | An inappropriate alliance between a parent and child, who side together against a third member of the family. |
| culture | Common patterns of bx & experience derived from settings in which people live |
| cybernetics | The study of feedback mechanisms in self-regulating systems. (e.g. levels and orders of change, feedback loops) Focuses on: Family rules, negative / positive feedback, sequences of family interactions. |
| differentiation of self | The psychological separation of intellect & emotions,, & independence of self from others; opposite of fusion. (the is a healthy trait) |
| directives | A therapeutic technique used by Jay Haley to become in charge of the family's treatment & get them to do something about the presenting problems |
| disengagement | Psychological isolation that results from overly rigid boundaries around individuals & subsystems in a family |
| double bind | Created when a person receives contradictory messages on different levels of abstraction in an important relationship & cannot leave or comment |
| emotional reactivity | Tendency to react in a knee-jerk reaction, not calmly and rationally. Feelings overwhelm thinking and drowned out individuality. |
| empathy | |
| enactment | An interaction stimulated in structural family therapy in order to observe and then change transactions that make up family structure. |
| enmeshed | Loss of autonomy due to a blurring of psychological boundaries |
| equifinality | The final results are the same regardless of which part of the system begins to change first. (e.g. it doesn't matter if the husband, wife, or child changes first). |
| ethnicity | Common ancestry through which groups of people evolve shared values & customs |
| expressive leader | serving social and emotional functions (traditionally the wife) |
| externalization | personifying problems as external to persons |
| family homeostasis | tendency for family to resist change in order to maintain a steady state (to avoid change) |
| family life cycle | Stages of family life from separation from one’s parents to marriage, having children, growing older, retirement, and finally death |
| family of origin | A person’s parents & siblings; usually refers to the original nuclear family of an adult |
| family rule | Governs the range of behavior a family system can tolerate. |
| family structure | Refers to the functional organization of families that determines how family members interact |
| family system | The family is conceived as a collective whole entity made up of individual parts plus the way they function together |
| feedback loop | The core of Cybernetics and the process by which the system gets the information necessary to maintain a steady course. The return of a portion of the output of a system (see positive and negative feedback) |
| first-order change | Temporary or superficial changes within a system that do not alter the basic organization of the system. |
| function of the symptom | The idea that symptoms are often ways to distract or otherwise protect family members from threatening conflicts |
| general systems theory | A biological model of living systems as whole entities that maintain themselves through continuous input & output from the environment (von Bertalanffy) |
| group dynamics | Interactions among group members that emerge as a result of properties of group rather than merely their individual personalities (e.g. scapegoats, coalitions, alignments, splits) |
| hierarchical structure | Clear generational boundaries, where parents maintain control and authority. |
| instrumental leader | decision making and task functions (traditionally the husband) |
| intensity | forceful intervening by the therapist |
| invariant prescription | parents are directed to mysteriously sneak away together. |
| linear causality | one event is the cause and another is the effect. Stimulus and response. |
| linear causality | The idea that one event is the cause & another is the effect: in behavior the idea that one behavior is a stimulus, the other a response |
| marital schism | A type of marital discord. A chronic failure to accommodate each other or to achieve role reciprocity |
| marital skew | Serious psychopathology in one partner who dominates the other. |
| metacommunication | Communicating (talking) about the ways of communicating. Every message has two levels: report & command; metacommunication is a covert & often unnoticed message accompanying communication |
| morphogenesis | Process by which a system changes to adapt to new situations. |
| multiple family group therapy | Tx of several families at once in a group therapy format (Peter Laquer & Murray Bowen) |
| multiple impact therapy | An intensive, crisis-oriented form of family therapy developed by Robert MacGregor: family members are treated in various subgroups by a team of therapists |
| mystification | distorting childs experience by denying or relabeling it. |
| narrative therapists | help their clients reframe the way they look at things |
| negative feedback | How far off the mark the system is straying and the corrections necessary. |
| network therapy | Assisting families in crisis by gathering the whole family, friends, employers, etc. (their social network) |
| neutrality | balanced acceptance of family members |
| object relations | attitudes and beliefs of self and others formed in early childhood (from parents) that drive attitudes and beliefs in current relationships |
| open system | A system that sustain themselves by continually interacting with outside environment. |
| ordeals | paradoxical intervention in which the client is directed to do something that is more of a hardship than the symptom |
| paradox | A self-contradictory statement based on a valid deduction from acceptable premises. See pg. 61. |
| paradoxical injunction | Therapist directs the family members to continue what they are doing. If they conform then admit control, if they don't the symptoms stop. |
| phenomenology | An emphasis on the deep personal involvement with clients instead of dissecting people as objects |
| positive connotation | ascribing positive motives to family behavior in order to promote family cohesion and avoid resistance to therapy. |
| positive feedback | information that confirms and reinforces the direction a system is taking. |
| pretend techniques | playful paradoxical intervention where family members are asked to pretend engage in symptomatic behavior. (if they are pretending to have the symptom, then it can not be real). |
| process/content | Distinction between how members of a family or group related & what they talk about |
| pseudohostility | Superficial bickering that blurs deeper hostility and affection. |
| pseudomutuality | A façade of togetherness that masks conflict and blocks intimacy, includes an unnatural dread of separateness. There is no room for separate identifies. |
| psuedomutuality | A façade of togetherness that masks conflict & blocks intimacy (Wynne et al.) see pg. 23 |
| psychodrama | A technique whereby patients act out their conflicts instead of just discussing them. One of the earliest approaches to group tx. |
| punctuation | Describing a sequence of interactions so that it appears one’s behavior was caused by another person. Communication therapists change the punctuation of events to free families from a linear causality framework. |
| reframing | relabeling behavior to shift how family members respond to it. E.g. Family thinks child is lazy, therapist reframes it as depression. |
| restraining | overcoming resistance by suggesting that the family cannot change |
| rituals | a set of prescribed actions designed to change a family's system rules |
| rubber fence | An invisible barrier that stretches to permit obligatory extra-familial involvement, such as going to school, but springs back tightly if that involvement goes too far |
| second-order change | basic change in the structure or functioning of the system. Hurley: the addition of new options to the system. |
| self-actualization | Our healthy instinct to do what is best for us & helps us flourish (Rogers) |
| shaping | reinforcing change in small steps |
| social constructionism | Our interpretations of the world are shaped by the social context in which we live. |
| solution focused therapy | the best way to solve problems is to discover what people do when they are not having the problem and then build on that |
| structure of interaction | Recurrent patterns of interaction that define & stabilize the shape of relationships |
| subsystems | Smaller units in families, determined by generation, sex, or function |
| symmetrical relationships | Relationships based on equality; the behavior of one mirrors that of the other or is considered parallel |
| system theory | studying a group of related elements that interact as a whole entity |
| transference | Distorted emotional reactions to present relationships based on unresolved, early family relations |
| triangle | the smallest stable unit of relationship |
| triangulation | Detouring conflict between two people by involving a third person, stabilizing the relationship between the original pair |
| unbalancing | the therapist joins with one person over another in an effort to break a stalemate situation. |
| undifferentiated family ego mass | emotional fusion within the family. Enmeshed families don't allow members to be emotionally differentiated. |
The first of many helpful FINAL EXAM prompts from my wonderful second year buddy...
SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY 1
Final Examination Sample 1
Name_______________________________________
T508/808 Systematic Theology I
Final Exam
Please do not take longer than two hours to take the test. Use your own paper and staple or clip it to this sheet.
Part One: Reading Assignments
1.Indicate what percentage of the assigned reading for the course you have completed: _______________.
Part Two: Long Essays
Answer both questions. You may look at the questions and organize your material before you begin the exam. You may use your Bible, textbooks, and notes on these two questions.
1.A new convert to Christ comes to you and says that she was visited by an evangelistic team, claiming to be Christians, the previous evening who said in the course of conversation that the doctrine of the trinity was not taught in the Scriptures. They told her that the word "trinity" is not found in the Bible and that it was not until the 4th century before churches adopted belief in the trinity. This young disciple wants to know what you think about these things. How would you explain to her where such false views come from and present to her the Biblical teaching on the Trinity? Be sure to also to note the practical importance of the doctrine of the trinity.
2.A Christian friend comes to you, distressed at having found many passages in the Bible which indicate that God chooses or predestines some to salvation. This teaching of predestination is troubling to him and he has always been taught that it is wrong and that it undercuts man's free will. In a sympathetic way, show him that the Bible does teach both God's predestination and man's responsibility. Then show the pastoral application of the doctrine of predestination to us: how it gives all glory to God for salvation, strengthens the Christian's assurance, and bolsters his hope of glory.
Part Three: Short Answers
Again answer all questions. You may look at the questions and organize your material before you begin the exam, BUT, this time, you may NOT use your textbooks, and notes (you may use your Bible). Give scriptural references in all answers. Answer the questions fully but briefly (that is, in a few sentences).
1.In outline, what is the Biblical view of the image of God in man?
2.What does "total depravity" mean? Defend it from Scripture.
3.What is "immediate imputation" of Adam's sin? Defend it from Scripture.
4.What is the difference between original sin and actual sin?
5.What is the doctrine of the "inerrancy" of Scripture? Defend it biblically. What do we mean by "plenary verbal inspiration?"
Final Examination Sample 2
Duration: 2 hours
No external aids allowed Name: ________________________
E-mail:________________________
Address:_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
Most of these questions requires a simple true or false answer. Others require a precise, yet concise answer. Please answer on the question sheets and return to the proctor following completion of the examination.
1. The biblical use of language for the purposes of revelation is:
anatomical
univocal
analogical
anthropological
2. Cite two principal passages elucidating the doctrine of general revelation:
_______________
_______________
3. In describing revelation we said three things: one of which was that revelation is an act of grace (because the initiative is God’s). Name the other two features:
________________
________________
4. Which of the following activities in special revelation continues:
revelation on the stage of history
revelation in the words of Scripture
revelation in the hearts of sinners enlightening Scripture
5. Which of the following did not believe in General Revelation:
Emil Brunner
Karl Barth
Louis Berkhof
6. Name five attributes of God that are discerned in general revelation:
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
7. According the Romans 1, the natural man (without the Bible)
understands some of that revelation
understands all of that revelation
8. According to the Bible, the natural man without a Bible and with only general revelation to go by may come to an understanding of the way of salvation. True or False?
9. Name three forms of special revelation God used before the canon of Scripture was complete:
___________________
___________________
___________________
10. What is meant by organic inspiration?
11. What is meant by plenary inspiration?
12. Cite two passages in the New Testament which speak to inspiration:
_________________
_________________
13. Cite two human attributes of Scripture:
________________
________________
14. Which (if any) of the following are incompatible with a doctrine of biblical inerrancy:
Textual criticism
Source criticism
Redaction criticism
15. Define the doctrine of inerrancy as applied to Scripture.
16. What is wrong with the expression: “Hear the Word of God as we find it in the Gospel of Matthew.”
17. Name two issues which have led some to a denial of inerrancy:
i.
ii.
18. Name three things that attest to the authority of Scripture:
i.
ii.
iii.
19. Define what we understand by the perspicuity of Scripture:
20. What did Calvin mean when he suggested that Scripture is autopiston?
21. What do we mean by the following:
God is immutable _____________________________________
God is impassible _____________________________________
God is eternal ________________________________________
22. In what passage in the Old Testament does God reveal his covenant name?
23. What do we mean by saying that “God is a spirit”?
24. Distinguish between the Latin expression:
Quid est Deus _______________________________
Qualis est Deus ______________________________
25. What do we understand by the following-
the retributive righteousness of God ______________________________
the remunerative righteousness of God ____________________________
26. Which of the following statements are true:
God exists in unity and plurality
God is One in essence
27. Which of the following are true:
God is three in essence
God is both three persons and one person
28. Is the following true of false:
The Son is eternally subordinate to the Father in his essence
The Son is eternally subordinate to the Father as the Mediator
Jesus is consubstantial with the Father
29. Give the technical term for the following:
The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are three roles performed by the One God: _______________________________
30. Distinguish the following:
economic trinitarianism __________________________
essential trinitarianism____________________________
31. Cite two passages in which the doctrine of the trinity is clearly evident:
___________________
___________________
32. Name one of the Cappadocian Fathers:
i. ________________________________
33. Distinguish homoousios and homoiousios:
i. _______________________________
ii._______________________________
34. “There was not a time when the Son was not.” Who said this?
i. __________________________
35. What does the term perichoresis mean? ____________________________________
36. Are the decrees of God singular or plural? __________________________________
37. God has foreordained whatsoever comes to pass. In chapter 3 of the Westminster
Confession, three caveats are entered at this point. What are they?
i. _______________________________________
ii. ______________________________________
iii. ______________________________________
38. Define supralapsarianism carefully and accurately:
_______________________________________________________________________
39. What indicators in chapter 3 of the Westminster Confession are there to suggest that the decree of reprobation is NOT equally ultimate with the decree of election?
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
40. From the narratives of Genesis 1 and 2, name three doctrines that relate to the area of anthropology:
i. _________________________________________________
ii._________________________________________________
________________________________________________
41. What do we understand by trichoticism?
42. Distinguish between creationist and traducianist views of the origin of the soul.
43. Distinguish between the natural and moral image of God in man.
44. Name five aspects of the natural image of God in man:
i._________________________
ii._________________________
iii_________________________
iv._________________________
v. _________________________
45. In the opening chapters of Genesis, name three specific mandates that God give to man:
i. _______________________________
ii._______________________________
iii._______________________________
46. Define the covenant of grace.
47. Name three other covenants in the Bible:
i. ________________
ii.________________
iii________________
48. How do Baptists and paedo-baptists distinguish themselves within this definition of the covenant of grace?
49. Distinguish between mediate and immediate imputation of sin:
i. _________________________
ii. _________________________
50. What, according to Augustine, is the sin against the Holy Spirit?
i. _____________________________________________
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)